How many of us have gotten that sinking feeling during a lesson or presentation that we’ve lost some participants? The dazed or bored look, side conversations, and of course, looking at the phone. You stand there explaining some idea or resource knowing your words are falling to the floor with a portion of the room. The sad part of this situation is feeling like a failure; the good part is failure causes you to reflect on what went wrong that you can improve.
Too Big Picture
As I considered where the disconnect lay in my presentations, I realized it was most often with classroom teachers. My usual audience is school librarians, so content and practice often remain big picture (unless it’s on a specific skill or program). We tend to think on a macro level because we work with multiple grades and content areas. Our approach can leave classroom teachers frustrated because they’re thinking about day-to-day instruction, assessment, testing, report cards, and classroom management. Hearing about the wonderful features of Encyclopedia Britannica or the fantastic new books on climate change is met with a nod and silence, no follow-up questions or invitations to schedule a meeting to collaborate. Teachers don’t want or have the time to translate these resources into classroom instruction. We need to do the cognitive lift for them if we want the resources to be used to boost student learning.
Imagine if someone told you to see results from running, you have to do intervals. Unless you’re an avid runner, it’s unlikely you will look up what intervals are, much less how to incorporate them into your practice.
Articulate the Instructional Possibilities
So instead of overwhelming tired educator brains with content overload, we should select an opinion/op-ed article from a database on climate change and demonstrate how to add text-dependent questions and highlight key phrases to support student understanding of the author’s intent. By knowing an author’s purpose and authority, students are better able to evaluate their claims and evidence. And now that we’ve hooked teachers because they see how this database can support their instruction, we can show them a few more features to whet their appetite for all it has to offer! We can use the same process with a book: point to the text features, reading level, and images/primary sources to show how it can support students to:
- Understand multiple perspectives
- Build prior knowledge
- Support vocabulary development
- Understand fact versus opinion
In my case, my workshop was on early childhood. I focused on collections, programs, and partnerships. I did not mention instruction except for a few stray sentences. Now I know when I offer the workshop again, I will add an activity about selecting a picture book with an instructional purpose for a read-aloud. Yes, we need to build strong library collections to promote independent reading and choice, but our collections also serve the micro level of instruction: how a picture book can help students develop questions, explore new ideas, and build vocabulary and cultural knowledge.
Educators Want to Collaborate
Most educators want to collaborate if they see the relevance to their practice. We just need to articulate how we impact instruction to connect with our classroom colleagues to plan lessons from inception to delivery to assessment.
Author: Leanne Ellis
I am a School Library Instructional Coordinator for the New York City Department of Education’s Office of Literacy, AIS, and Library Services. I plan and deliver workshops, provide on-site instructional and program support to school librarians, coordinate programs, administer grants, and just started facilitating an online course on Information Literacy for Spring 2019.